ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:27 ,大小:293.29KB ,
资源ID:169764      下载积分:12 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.wnwk.com/docdown/169764.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: QQ登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(ASTM_E_1958_-_12.pdf)为本站会员(益****师)主动上传,蜗牛文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知蜗牛文库(发送邮件至admin@wnwk.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

ASTM_E_1958_-_12.pdf

1、Designation:E195812Standard Guide forSensory Claim Substantiation1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1958;the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or,in the case of revision,the year of last revision.A number in parentheses indicates t

2、he year of last reapproval.Asuperscript epsilon()indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.INTRODUCTIONFormats or standards for testing related to claim substantiation cannot be considered without aframe of reference of where that format or standard would fit within the leg

3、al framework thatsurrounds the topic.Tests are performed for three basic reasons:(1)Comparison of ProductsDetermines how one product compares to another,usually acompetitor or earlier version of itself.(2)Substantiation of ClaimsEnables marketing personnel to use positive references throughadvertisi

4、ng or packaging,or both,in the presentation of the product to the consumer.(3)Test Performance Ascertains and establishes the tested product performance within the scopeof its intended use.Compelling and aggressive claims are sure to be scrutinized closely by competitive firms,and ifinconsistencies

5、are found through competitive test data,the claims could be challenged in one or moreof the following venues:(1)National Advertising Division of the Council of the Better BusinessBureau,Inc.(NAD),(2)National Advertising Review Board(NARB),(3)one or more media,suchas print,broadcast,or electronic med

6、ia,(4)Consumer Advocacy Organizations,and(5)Civil orFederal courts.No single test design or standard test will prevent challenges.The criteria used by each of thepotential forums are not identical and are constantly evolving.With the introduction of newtechnologies coupled with changing consumer dem

7、ands,testing processes and protocols that weresufficient five or ten years ago may not hold up under todays criteria and scrutiny.Conversely,it canonly be speculated about the testing requirements of the future.The one constant is that,as advocatesof their clients positions,attorneys will defend the

8、ir clients testing processes and protocol whilequestioning with great detail every aspect of their competitors protocol in the attempt to sway thearbiter to agree that their clients are in the right.This guide demonstrates what a group of professionals who are skilled in the science of testingconsid

9、er reasonable,and represents an effective method for both defendant and challenger todetermine the viability of a claim.The keyword is“reasonable.”If a particular aspect of a test is notreasonable for a specific application,it should not be used.Care should be taken to clearly define thereasons and

10、data supporting a deviation from the standard,as any departure invites scrutiny.Sincedepartures are inevitable,the word“should”is used in this guide to indicate when other techniquesmay have application in certain unusual circumstances.Whenever a test protocol has been completed,it should be critiqu

11、ed for weaknesses in reasonability.If weaknesses are found,corrective actionshould be taken,since the competition may point out any weakness or discrepancy and challenge the“reasonableness”of the study.With the importance of“reasonableness,”the question remains,“What is reasonable?”Unfortunately,the

12、re is no specific answer to that question.The measure of“reasonable”depends onthe company making the claim and its approach toward advertising.Some companies are aggressive;others are conservative.It will depend on the nature of the claim and the status of the competitor,themagnitude of the advertis

13、ing campaign,and the frequency of the advertisements exposure.Marketpressures(such as timing),testing budgets,and the internal dynamics of a companys marketing andlegal/regulatory approval departments also affect the interpretation of“reasonable.”Competition willconsider most tests unreasonable;ther

14、efore,it is more important to focus on whether the review boardconsiders the test more reasonable than the competitors challenge.Copyright ASTM International,100 Barr Harbor Drive,PO Box C700,West Conshohocken,PA 19428-2959.United States1 1.Scope1.1 This guide covers reasonable practices for designi

15、ng andimplementing sensory tests that validate claims pertaining onlyto the sensory or perceptual attributes,or both,of a product.This guide was developed for use in the United States and mustbe adapted to the laws and regulations for advertisement claimsubstantiation for any other country.A claim i

16、s a statementabout a product that highlights its advantages,sensory orperceptual attributes,or product changes or differences com-pared to other products in order to enhance its marketability.Attribute,performance,and hedonic claims,both comparativeand non-comparative,are covered.This guide includes broadprinciples covering selecting and recruiting representativeconsumer samples,selecting and preparing products,construct-ing product rating forms,test execution,and statistical han-dling of data.T

copyright@ 2008-2023 wnwk.com网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:浙ICP备2024059924号-2