ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:11 ,大小:493.95KB ,
资源ID:189953      下载积分:9 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.wnwk.com/docdown/189953.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: QQ登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(ASTM_F_2996_-_13.pdf)为本站会员(益****师)主动上传,蜗牛文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知蜗牛文库(发送邮件至admin@wnwk.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

ASTM_F_2996_-_13.pdf

1、Designation:F299613Standard Practice forFinite Element Analysis(FEA)of Non-Modular MetallicOrthopaedic Hip Femoral Stems1This standard is issued under the fixed designation F2996;the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or,in the case of revision,the ye

2、ar of last revision.A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.Asuperscript epsilon()indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1.Scope1.1 This practice establishes requirements and consider-ations for the numerical simulation of non-modular(that is,limite

3、d to monolithic stems with only a femoral head/trunniontaper interface)metallic orthopaedic hip stems using FiniteElement Analysis(FEA)techniques for the estimation ofstresses and strains.This standard is only applicable to stressesbelow the yield strength,as provided in the material certifica-tion.

4、1.2 PurposeThis practice establishes requirements andconsiderations for the development of finite element models tobe used in the evaluation of non-modular metallic orthopaedichip stem designs for the purpose of prediction of the staticimplant stresses and strains.This procedure can be used forworst

5、 case assessment within a family of implant sizes toprovide efficiencies in the amount of physical testing to beconducted.Recommended procedures for performing modelchecks and verification are provided to help determine if theanalysis follows recommended guidelines.Finally,the recom-mended content o

6、f an engineering report covering the mechani-cal simulation is presented.1.3 LimitsThis practice is limited in discussion to thestatic structural analysis of non-modular metallic orthopaedichip stems(which excludes the prediction of fatigue strength).1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regar

7、ded asstandard.No other units of measurement are included in thisstandard.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns,if any,associated with its use.It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine th

8、e applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2.Referenced Documents2.1 ISO Standards:2ISO 7206-4(2010)Implants for SurgeryPartial and TotalHip Joint ProsthesesPart 4:Determination of EnduranceProperties and Performance of Stemmed Femoral Com-ponents3.Significance and Use3.1 This practice

9、is applicable to the calculation of stressesseen on a femoral hip stem when loaded in a manner describedin ISO 7206-4(2010).This method can be used to establish theworst case size for a particular implant.When stresses calcu-lated using this practice were compared to the stresses mea-sured from phys

10、ical strain gauging techniques performed attwo laboratories using two different methods,the resultscorrelated to within 8%.4.Geometric Data4.1 Finite element models are based on a geometric repre-sentation of the device being studied.The source of thegeometric details can be obtained from drawings,s

11、olid models,preliminary sketches,or any other source consistent withdefining the model geometry.In building the finite elementmodel,certain geometric details may be omitted from theorthopaedic implant geometry shown in the CAD model if it isdetermined that they are not relevant to the intended analy

12、sis.Engineering judgment shall be exercised to establish the extentof model simplification and shall be justified.4.2 It is most appropriate to consider the“worst case”stresscondition for the orthopaedic implant being simulated.The“worst case”shall be determined from all relevant engineeringconsider

13、ations,such as stem geometry,dimensions,and headoffset.If finite element analysis is being used for determiningthe worst case,then the worst case head offset may not beknown.It may be necessary to run several variants of headoffset,in order to determine this.1This practice is under the jurisdiction

14、ofASTM Committee F04 on Medical andSurgical Materials and Devices and is the direct responsibility of SubcommitteeF04.22 on Arthroplasty.Current edition approved July 15,2013.Published August 2013.DOI:10.1520/F2996-13.2Available from International Organization for Standardization(ISO),1,ch.dela Voie

15、-Creuse,CP 56,CH-1211 Geneva 20,Switzerland,http:/www.iso.org.Copyright ASTM International,100 Barr Harbor Drive,PO Box C700,West Conshohocken,PA 19428-2959.United States1 5.Material Properties5.1 The required material properties for input into an FEAmodel for the calculation of strains and displace

16、ment aremodulus of elasticity(E)and Poissons ratio().These valuescan be obtained from material certification data.It should benoted that as ISO 7206-4(2010)is run under load control,theFEA should also be run under load control.When the FEA isrun under load control,the modulus of elasticity will not affectthe stress calculations under small displacement theory but willaffect displacement and strain.The influence of Poissons ratioon the stress calculations is negligible.5.2 Ensure that material pr

copyright@ 2008-2023 wnwk.com网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:浙ICP备2024059924号-2