1、 81/247A/RVCRESULT OF VOTING ON CDV Project number:IEC 62305-3,Ed.1 Reference number of the CDV 81/240/CDV IEC/TC or SC TC 81 Date of circulation 2004-08-27 Title of the TC or SC concerned Lightning protection Title of the committee draft:IEC 62305-3,Ed.1:Protection against lightning-Part 3:Physical
2、 damage to structures and life hazard The above-mentioned document was distributed to National Committees with a request that voting take place for approval for circulation as an FDIS(or publication as a Technical Specification or Report)Voting results see printout attached Comments received see ann
3、ex 1)In the case that the approval criteria for acceptance have been met,a The committee draft for vote(CDV)will be registered as an FDIS by(date)2004-12 b The draft technical report(DTR)will be published as a Technical Report The draft technical specification(DTS)will be published as a Technical Sp
4、ecification by(date).DECISION OF THE CHAIRMAN(in cooperation with the secretariat),in the case that the approval criteria for acceptance have not been met c A revised committee draft for vote(CDV)will be distributed by(date).d A revised committee draft(CD)will be distributed by(date).NOTE In the cas
5、e of a proposal c or d made by the chairman,P-members objecting to such a proposal shall inform the Central Office with copy to the secretary in writing within 2 months of the circulation of this compilation(see ISO/IEC Directives,Part 1,2.6.5).The comments will be discussed at the next meeting of t
6、he on(date)Name or signature of the Secretary G.B.Lo Piparo Name or signature of the Chairman C.Bouquegneau This document cancels and replaces document 81/247/RVC.1)to be collated on Form Comments and annexed.2 81/247A/RVC ANNEX A Result of Voting on CDV-Document 81/240/CDV Project:IEC 62305-3 Ed.1
7、IEC 62305-3,Ed.1:Protection against lightning-Part 3:Physical damage to structures and life hazard Circulation Date:2004-01-09 Closing Date:2004-06-11 Country Status Received Vote Comments Austria P 2004-06-08 N Y Belgium P 2004-04-29 Y-China P 2004-06-03 Y-Colombia P 2004-06-10 Y-Denmark P 2004-06-
8、04 N Y France P 2004-06-03 Y Y Germany P 2004-06-09 N Y Greece P 2004-06-11 Y Y Ireland O 2004-06-02 Y-Italy P 2004-06-10 Y Y Japan P 2004-06-11 N Y Korea(Rep.of)P 2004-06-11 Y-Luxemburg P 2004-06-09 Y-Mexico O 2004-06-11 A Y Netherlands P 2004-05-19 Y Y Norway P 2004-06-10 Y-Poland P 2004-06-04 Y Y
9、 Portugal P 2004-06-09 Y-Romania O 2004-05-13 Y-Russian Fed.P 2004-06-10 Y-Serbia&Montenegro P 2004-05-17 Y-Slovenia O 2004-06-10 Y-Spain P 2004-06-07 Y-Sweden P 2004-06-10 A-Switzerland P 2004-05-18 Y-U.S.A.P 2004-06-10 N Y United Kingdom P 2004-06-08 Y Y Approval Criteria Result P-members voting:2
10、2 P-members in favour:17=77%=67%APPROVEDTotal votes cast:25 Total against:5=20%=25%APPROVEDFinal Decision:APPROVED NOTES 1.Vote:Does the National Committee agree to the circulation of the draft as a FDIS:Y=In favour;N=Against;A=Abstention.2.Only votes received before the closing date are counted in
11、determining the decision.Late Votes:(0).3.Abstentions are not taken into account when totalizing the votes.4.P-members not voting:Australia;South Africa;(2).3 81/247A/RVC Annex B NOTE Comments were considered by WG 8 at its meeting in July 2004.NOTE Purely editorial comments are labelled with symbol
12、“E”and will be considered as noted.Date Document 2004-08-13 81/240/CDV National Committee Clause/Subclause Paragraph Figure/Table Type of comment(General/Technical/Editorial)COMMENTS Proposed change OBSERVATIONS OF THE SECRETARIAT on each comment submitted AT 1 General AT rejects the document becaus
13、e the required separation distances s defined in subclause 6.3 are unrealistically high especially for LPS type I and II.Long term practical experiences with separation distances s in the range of 0.4m as it was required by the former Austrian national lightning protection standard OVE E49:1988-have
14、 demonstrated sufficient protection for the vast majority of objects.Table 10 will be amended as follows:“ki=0,08 LPS I ki=0,06 LPS II ki=0,04 LPS III IV”DK1 General Troughout E Formulae should be numbered for easy reference.E PL 1 General The draft of IEC 62305-3 is very well prepared;only Annex F
15、is too extensive-elimination of some repetitions would be helpful.Try to make Annex F more compact.Noted.DK2 Introduction Par 1 E Propose rewrite This part of IEC 62305 deals with protection of structures against physical damages and protection against injuries of living beings in and near the struc
16、ture due to touch and step voltages.See United States 2 United States 1 Entire Document General The USNC cannot concur with the approval of the CDV until which point the significant technical points addressed in Address the technical comments during the July 2004 WG8 meeting in Rome and develop a new draft CDV Noted.4 81/247A/RVC National Committee Clause/Subclause Paragraph Figure/Table Type of comment(General/Technical/Editorial)COMMENTS Proposed change OBSERVATIONS OF THE SECRETARIAT on each